HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-03

Digital Humanism - Putting people at the centre of the digital transformation (CSA) -

Related topics

Drag to rearrange · hover a topic or connection to preview why it's linked, click to pin that panel open

Topics in this graph

Bold node = current topic · node color = call status · hover for details, click to pin · smaller, lighter topics are two steps away

Call text (as on F&T portal)

View on F&T portal

Expected Outcome:

  • Create an active network and cross disciplinary communities on digital humanism bringing together ICT experts, ethnologists, sociologists and experts in fundamental rights
  • Help defining and strengthening EU’s approach to a human-centred digital transformation through cross-disciplinary, world class foundational and application oriented research
  • Formulate approaches how to transform and strengthen European standards (rule of law, social market economy, fundamental rights, social standards and social partnership) into the digital realm including the take up of those standards by digital actors and in particular those developing new digital environment (e.g. data scientists, start-ups, investors)
  • Formulate a list of recommendations and roadmaps to address current gaps or issues that are preventing the development of digital solutions that will reinforce - and not undermine - digital humanism across the society
  • Propose a concrete framework for measuring and promoting progress of the promotion and putting into practice of the digital rights and principles declaration in the context of the Digital Decade policy programme. This will include concrete indicators, source of information at national and European level, as well as the identification of existing, and development of new, capacity tools to support the uptake of identified best practice uses of digital technologies in support of digital humanism. This work will notably feed the review of the Digital Decade Policy Programme and of the solemn declaration in 2026.

Scope:

A horizontal and holistic approach is needed for creating a more resilient, inclusive and democratic European society, prepared and responsive to opportunities, societal changes, threats and disasters, addressing inequalities and providing protection and high-quality public services such as health care, and empowering all citizens to act in the green and digital transitions.

While digital technologies bring strong advantages coming along with a promise of freedom and innovation, negative aspects have also become visible in the last years. These include the monopolization of the information space, increasing levels of fake news and disinformation, strong power of online platforms, cyber threats and crimes, privacy breaches, strong market disparities as well as an economic order that claims human experience as free raw material for commercial practices of extraction, prediction and sales (Zuboff, 2019).

Digital Humanism is here defined as the continuing search for a European answer to keep up high civilization standards stemming from enlightenment and the humanist era, and to further develop them in the digital world. In line with European values, such a digital environment should enable all Europeans to make full use of digital and technologies, to have a society where geographical distance matters less, so that all Europeans can benefit from the digitalisation in their daily activities (ranging from work, learning, to enjoying culture or leisure activities) but also in their interactions with governments, and participation in democratic processes.

This requires intense, cross-disciplinary work of computer (and technology) sciences with legal, economic, sociological, philosophical and other kinds of expertise as a co-development exercise. To support in-depth, early-on collaboration between computer sciences and the whole wealth of humanities and social sciences to put new algorithms and models into a broader context, proposals under this topic should:

  • Support the development of cross-disciplinary communities and networks in relation to digital transformation of society. It is thus critical to foster greater exchanges between social sciences and technological communities.
  • Support the cross-disciplinary co-development of new theoretical models and approaches of the impact of digital technologies in our societies, starting with human and societal needs.
  • Showcasing success stories and examples of engagement of the digital community seeking to develop concrete ways to progress toward a more human-centred digital world and draw concrete conclusions from these.
  • Mapping out collaborative research to develop concrete tools and frameworks for ensuring that all actors of the European digital ecosystem (policy makers, business, startup developers, investors, NGOs) can integrate in their work and activities the values that form a human centred digital transformation and develop a roadmap for the possible development of research activities
  • Develop a conceptual framework as well as tools and indicators to monitor and promote the progress of the ‘declaration on digital rights and principles’ and its six chapters (putting people at the centre of the digital transformation; solidarity and inclusion; freedom of choice; participation in the digital public space; safety, security and empowerment; sustainability), notably to feed the review of the Digital Decade Policy Programme and of the solemn declaration in 2026.

This project is also relevant in the policy context of the Digital Decade policy programme (“The Path to the Digital Decade”), which sets a European approach for its digital transformation based on values and technological leadership. For the first time, societal and human centred objectives are fully integrated into a comprehensive governance mechanism at EU level including monitoring of the progress made by the digital transformation in reaching our collective values and quantitative digital targets (skills, infrastructures, digitalisation of business and public services).

News flashes

2026-10-08

EVALUATION results

Published: 18.04.2024

Deadline: 18.09.2024

Available budget: EUR 72,500,000

The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:

HUMAN-03-01

HUMAN-03-02

HUMAN-03-03

HUMAN-03-04

Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)

27

131

23

2

Number of inadmissible proposals

0

0

0

0

Number of ineligible proposals

1

5

1

0

Number of above-threshold proposals

19

92

10

1

Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals

444,267,401.95 €              

673,046,895.38 €               

14,727,623.27 €               

6,000,000 €

Number of proposals retained for funding

2

3

1

1

Number of proposals in the reserve list

1

1

1

0

Funding threshold

14.5

15

14.5

12.5

Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14

3

14

1

0

Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13

4

20

1

0

Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10

12

58

8

1

Summary of observer reports:

Observer report for topics HUMAN-03-01, 02 and 04:

Based on the achieved results the overall quality of the evaluation is rated as “very good”. The topics in this report were monitored by a team of two Independent Observers. The entire observation process was conducted remotely through analysis of documentation on the SEP system and consensus and panel meetings held in the video conferencing system (Cisco Webex). The Independent Observers (IO) verified that the procedures set out or referred to in the EU Funding & Tenders Online Manual are followed, drew the attention of Commission staff to any potential deficiencies; and compiled a report with findings and recommendations aiming to improve the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the evaluation process. Scale of the evaluation task as well as its complexity were challenging but within the boundaries of the professional and personal capacities of the experts who were invited to evaluate the proposals received in response to this Call. The exercise was very well prepared and managed excellently by the Call and Topic Coordinators and their teams. The Commission staff is to be commended for their professionalism during the exercise. The organisation and scheduling of evaluator briefings, and consensus meetings was carried out with considered efficiency and effectiveness. The Independent Observers are satisfied that the evaluation process conformed to the applicable rules and required standards. The evaluation process was fair, efficient, and effective and the throughput time of the evaluation process was good. The Commission staff is to be commended for the support provided to the observers during their task. procedures and tools were efficient, reliable and user-friendly. All evaluation procedures monitored by the observers were implemented in conformity with the applicable and agreed rules. All experts and involved actors adhered strictly to the guiding principles of independence, objectivity, accuracy, and consistency. No significant deviations have been observed or reported to the observers. The observers have given careful consideration to recommendations which were discussed during the checkpoint meeting with EU Staff. Based on observations the following recommendations can be derived:

  • The gender balance in the Experts pool still has room for improvement
  • Despite the time pressure, more regular breaks should be foreseen and planned for online meetings, especially for the second half or full day panel meetings.
  • Text highlighting should be a future feature of the SEP editor.
  • Although the scoring process has considerably improved by focussing on the wording first, applied procedures should be further strengthened and harmonised.
  • The efficiency of the consensus phase could be improved by returning to physical presence meetings to discuss proposals on site.

Observer report for topic HUMAN-03-03:

The IO finds that the evaluation followed the applicable rules for the call, and that it was competently evaluated in a fair and equitable manner by the experts and continuously monitored by the Agency staff. The IO did not observe any event or activity that gave rise to specific concern that might have jeopardised the fairness of the evaluation. HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-03: 23 proposals were submitted; 1 proposal accepted for funding. The expert team evaluating the proposals were perfectly gender balanced and from the broadest possible national representation.

We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.

For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.

2026-10-08

PROPOSAL NUMBERS

Call HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03 has closed on the 18/09/2024.

183 proposals have been submitted.

The breakdown per topic is:

  • HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-01: 27 proposals
  • HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-02: 131 proposals
  • HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-03: 23 proposals
  • HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-04: 2 proposals

Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in December 2024.

2024-04-24
The submission session is now available for: HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-02(HORIZON-RIA), HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-03(HORIZON-CSA), HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-01(HORIZON-RIA), HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-04(HORIZON-CSA)
call topic details
Call status: Closed
Opening date: 2024-04-23 (2 years ago)
Closing date: 2024-09-18 (2 years ago)
Procedure: single-stage

Budget: 1,500,000
Expected grants: 1
Contribution: 1,500,000 - 1,500,000
News flashes

This call topic has been appended 3 times by the EC with news.

  • 2026-10-08
    evaluation resultspublished: 18.04.2024d...
  • 2026-10-08
    proposal numbers call horizon-cl4-2024-h...
  • 2024-04-24
    the submission session is now available...
Call

HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03

Call topics are often grouped together in a call. Sometimes this is for a thematic reason, but often it is also for practical reasons.

There are 3 other topics in this call:

Source information

Showing the latest information. Found 7 versions of this call topic in the F&T portal.

Information from

  • 2026-02-18_06-49-34
  • 2025-07-02_03-32-58
  • 2025-01-11_03-30-12
  • 2024-11-23_03-30-15
  • 2024-11-04_17-25-09
  • 2024-09-30_21-20-58
  • 2024-07-11_18-29-29

Check the differences between the versions.

Annotations

You must be logged in to add annotations
No annotations yet

Events

Hand-picked events relevant to this call topic.

No events yet

There are currently no events linked to this call topic.

Timeline

Track where this call stands in its lifecycle, from work programme to grant signature, and see what's likely to happen next.

Grant agreement signed · 18 May 2025 (1 year ago)

All expected milestones for this call have passed.

Today

Work programme published

23 Feb 2024 · est.

Call opens

23 Apr 2024

Call closes

18 Sep 2024

Call published

30 Sep 2024

Outcome expected

18 Feb 2025 · est.

Grant agreement signed

18 May 2025 · est.

Preparation Open for submission Evaluation Grant preparation Not yet reached
  1. Work programme published Estimated

    23 Feb 2024 · 2 years ago

    Topics are listed in the Work Programme before the call opens. Spotting this early gives you a head start on partner search and proposal planning.

  2. Call opens

    23 Apr 2024 · 2 years ago

    Submissions can be made from this date.

  3. Call closes

    18 Sep 2024 · 2 years ago

    Deadline to submit a proposal.

  4. Call published

    30 Sep 2024 · 2 years ago

    This topic was first published in TopicTree.

  5. Outcome expected Estimated

    18 Feb 2025 · 1 year ago

    The maximum time to inform applicants of the evaluation outcome is five months after the call closes.

  6. Grant agreement signed Estimated

    18 May 2025 · 1 year ago

    The maximum time to sign the grant agreement is three months after applicants are informed of the outcome.

Funded Projects

Loading...

Project information comes from CORDIS (for Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe) and will be sourced from F&T Portal (for Digital Europe projects)

Call document info

This section will come soon and contain the scraped information from the call document, such as the expected impact, scope, and other relevant sections. In the meantime, you can find this information in the call text section or directly on the F&T portal. View on F&T portal