CALL UPDATE: FLASH EVALUATION RESULTSHORIZON-CL4-2025-01
Published: 06.05.2025
Deadline: 23.09.2025
Available call budget: 539 MEUR: 494 MEUR (year 2025) and 45 MEUR (year 2027).
We recently informed the applicants of proposals, placed in Reserve Lists, and applicants of proposals, not retained for funding, about the evaluation results for their proposals. Applicants of proposals, retained for funding, will be informed on the week of 5 January 2026.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-TWIN-TRANSITION-01
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-TWIN-TRANSITION-02
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)
80
94
Number of inadmissible proposals
0
0
Number of ineligible proposals
0
0
Number of above-threshold proposals
77
73
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals, EUR
€ 497,061,293.81
€ 420,920,000.05
Number of proposals retained for funding
5
6
Number of proposals in the reserve list
2
2
Funding threshold 1
14.0
14.5
Ranking distribution (above-threshold proposals):
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14
7
15
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13
21
18
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10
49
40
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-TWIN-TRANSITION-05
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-TWIN-TRANSITION-31
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)
64
13
Number of inadmissible proposals
1
1
Number of ineligible proposals
0
0
Number of above-threshold proposals
55
10
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals, EUR
€ 341,794,971.09
€ 86,551,398.47
Number of proposals retained for funding
6
3
Number of proposals in the reserve list
6
1
Funding threshold 1
13.5
12.5
Ranking distribution (above-threshold proposals):
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14
5
1
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13
11
1
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10
39
8
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-TWIN-TRANSITION-32
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-TWIN-TRANSITION-33
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)
19
35
Number of inadmissible proposals
0
0
Number of ineligible proposals
0
0
Number of above-threshold proposals
18
29
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals, EUR
€ 164,758,955.97
€ 225,767,835.51
Number of proposals retained for funding
3
3
Number of proposals in the reserve list
2
2
Funding threshold 1
13.0
14.0
Ranking distribution (above-threshold proposals):
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14
1
5
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13
2
5
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10
15
19
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-TWIN-TRANSITION-34
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-TWIN-TRANSITION-36
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)
12
25
Number of inadmissible proposals
1
0
Number of ineligible proposals
0
1
Number of above-threshold proposals
9
20
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals, EUR
€ 74,512,631.79
€ 136,077,018.16
Number of proposals retained for funding
4
3
Number of proposals in the reserve list
1
2
Funding threshold 1
12.5
14.5
Ranking distribution (above-threshold proposals):
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14
1
7
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13
1
3
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10
7
10
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-TWIN-TRANSITION-37
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-TWIN-TRANSITION-38
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)
22
1
Number of inadmissible proposals
0
0
Number of ineligible proposals
0
0
Number of above-threshold proposals
19
1
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals, EUR
€ 244,556,653.00
€ 998,733.23
Number of proposals retained for funding
2
1
Number of proposals in the reserve list
1
0
Funding threshold 1
14.0
12.0
Ranking distribution (above-threshold proposals):
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14
2
0
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13
5
0
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10
12
1
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-TWIN-TRANSITION-39
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-MATERIALS-31
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)
3
33
Number of inadmissible proposals
0
0
Number of ineligible proposals
0
0
Number of above-threshold proposals
3
23
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals, EUR
€ 5,999,359.37
€ 112,586,512.84
Number of proposals retained for funding
1
2
Number of proposals in the reserve list
1
2
Funding threshold 1
14.5
14.5
Ranking distribution (above-threshold proposals):
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14
2
6
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13
0
8
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10
1
9
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-MATERIALS-44
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-MATERIALS-45
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)
4
3
Number of inadmissible proposals
0
0
Number of ineligible proposals
0
0
Number of above-threshold proposals
3
2
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals, EUR
€ 6,148,252.46
€ 52,450,095.00
Number of proposals retained for funding
1
1
Number of proposals in the reserve list
1
1
Funding threshold 1
13.0
13.0
Ranking distribution (above-threshold proposals):
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14
0
0
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13
1
1
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10
2
1
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-MATERIALS-52
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-MATERIALS-61
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)
35
38
Number of inadmissible proposals
2
0
Number of ineligible proposals
0
0
Number of above-threshold proposals
29
35
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals, EUR
€ 142,641,614.93
€ 267,406,667.69
Number of proposals retained for funding
3
3
Number of proposals in the reserve list
1
1
Funding threshold 1
13.5
15.0
Ranking distribution (above-threshold proposals):
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14
1
6
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13
8
6
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10
20
23
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-MATERIALS-62
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-MATERIALS-63
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)
31
7
Number of inadmissible proposals
0
0
Number of ineligible proposals
2
0
Number of above-threshold proposals
26
7
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals, EUR
€ 193,264,925.61
€ 55,540,848.02
Number of proposals retained for funding
4
3
Number of proposals in the reserve list
4
1
Funding threshold 1
12.5
14.0
Ranking distribution (above-threshold proposals):
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14
2
1
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13
8
2
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10
16
5
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-MATERIALS-64
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-DIGITAL-61
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)
11
47
Number of inadmissible proposals
0
1
Number of ineligible proposals
0
0
Number of above-threshold proposals
1
36
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals, EUR
€ 115,922,011.89
€ 212,506,125.64
Number of proposals retained for funding
1
5
Number of proposals in the reserve list
0
5
Funding threshold 1
11.0
12.5
Ranking distribution (above-threshold proposals):
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14
0
2
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13
0
14
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10
1
20
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-DIGITAL-62
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-HUMAN-60
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)
7
3
Number of inadmissible proposals
0
2
Number of ineligible proposals
0
0
Number of above-threshold proposals
6
1
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals, EUR
€ 17,787,354.82
€ 1,500,000.00
Number of proposals retained for funding
1
1
Number of proposals in the reserve list
1
0
Funding threshold 1
15.0
13.5
Ranking distribution (above-threshold proposals):
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14
1
0
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13
0
1
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10
5
0
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-HUMAN-61
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-HUMAN-62
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)
3
15
Number of inadmissible proposals
1
0
Number of ineligible proposals
0
0
Number of above-threshold proposals
1
13
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals, EUR
€ 991,616.12
€ 26,266,303.08
Number of proposals retained for funding
1
1
Number of proposals in the reserve list
0
1
Funding threshold 1
12.0
15.0
Ranking distribution (above-threshold proposals):
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14
0
2
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13
0
6
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10
1
5
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-HUMAN-63
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-HUMAN-64
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)
10
20
Number of inadmissible proposals
1
0
Number of ineligible proposals
0
0
Number of above-threshold proposals
3
14
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals, EUR
€ 5,947,260.31
€ 13,901,610.30
Number of proposals retained for funding
1
5
Number of proposals in the reserve list
1
2
Funding threshold 1
14.5
14.0
Ranking distribution (above-threshold proposals):
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14
2
5
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13
0
4
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10
1
5
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-HUMAN-65
HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-HUMAN-66
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)
8
6
Number of inadmissible proposals
2
0
Number of ineligible proposals
0
0
Number of above-threshold proposals
2
4
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals, EUR
€ 5,999,978.08
€ 5,999,731.50
Number of proposals retained for funding
1
1
Number of proposals in the reserve list
1
2
Funding threshold 1
15.0
13.5
Ranking distribution (above-threshold proposals):
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14
0
0
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13
1
1
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10
1
3
1 Proposals with the same score were ranked according to the priority order procedure set out in the call conditions (for HE, in the General Annexes to the Work Programme or specific arrangements in the specific call/topic conditions).
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Feedback from the Independent Observer, “Twin-Transition” topics
According the observed Consensus meetings (CM) and Panel meetings, the evaluation procedures were carried with transparency, efficiency, fairness, consistency, impartiality with homogenous criteria in compliance with the applicable evaluation rules for each stage of the selection exercise (IER, CR, Quality Check, Panel ranking): the evaluation process was carried out in full accordance with the Horizon Europedocuments on proposal evaluation.
The IT utilised systems (SEP and CIRCABC) worked very well, and they are clear and useful for the evaluation procedures with many supporting documents to help the expert’s work. Webex tool was used for the meetings, and it worked very well permitting a good interaction level for the experts during their discussion about each evaluated proposal.
In this way all the procedures to select the best proposals were very adequate to define the final ranking to select the best projects to be financed according to the call’s indications.
Feedback from the Independent Observer, “Materials” topics
Evaluation of proposals was successfully carried out in a fair and transparent manner considering that this was a record year with the large number of proposal submissions, 639 proposals (total in all topics), that required a great effort on the part of the HADEA team to engage 490 experts as evaluators, as to ensure the most efficient approach and running of the evaluation period.
The whole process was orchestrated well in a very professional manner and the HADEA team performed a good job in the short period of three weeks to accomplish the evaluations, the cross readings and the ranking panels to the satisfaction of all involved.
Feedback from the Independent Observer, “Human” and “Digital” topics
The independent observer was appointed to assist HaDEA on the evaluation process for HUMAN and DIGITAL topics in order to, inter alia, examine the quality and consistency of application the evaluation criteria and verify compliance with the procedures set out in the applicable rules. The representative sample of observations the observer made provided a good basis to draw valid conclusions.
The observed process was well designed, coordinated and implemented. It was efficient and transparent. The process was carried out in full compliance with the applicable rules and procedures.
The evaluation criteria and scoring system were properly applied across all topics.
All eligible proposals went through several evaluation steps, starting from individual evaluations conducted independently by 3 to 5 assigned experts (depending on the topic and type of action), through a detailed consensus discussion, and - for those topics where different sets of evaluators were assessing different proposals within the topic - cross-reading and panel review. The implementation of this multi-step procedure ensured the maximum degree of impartiality and fairness throughout the entire process.
Evaluation reports were reviewed by experienced quality controllers for consistency and quality.
The quality of the observed evaluation was very good. It was a well-designed, well-structured and properly implemented process, resulting in an impartial and fair outcome.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *