HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-20
Innovative tools and services to manage and empower energy communities -
Call text (as on F&T portal)
View on F&T portalExpected Outcome:
Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:
- Integration of home and building assets in an efficient way based on common Internet of Things (IoT) communication standards for smart homes and using SGAM architecture and data models (e.g., IEC CIM) for load, generation and storage devices;
- Facilitate local energy trading and distributed grid-oriented services using micro market and transactions (e.g., peer-to-peer) and improve the market participation for citizens;
- Enhance the integration of energy communities in European energy grids and increase the renewable energy share and use of flexibility by providing transparent and efficient market-based cost sharing mechanisms;
- Increase the security of data exchange, for prosumer and customer resources, and independent (commercial) asset operators;
- Increase synergies using a cross-sectoral approach (e.g., electricity, gas, mobility, heating/cooling) at the level of citizens and/or energy communities;
- Empower local governments and intermediaries, strengthen overall community energy policies in EU Member States and enhance tool accessibility and user capacity at local level to promote a decentralised and co-owned energy transition.
Scope:
The project should:
- Develop innovative and open-source tools for managing shared energy community assets (e.g., energy storage facilities) and optimising energy community management (e.g., selection and switching of aggregators, preparation and trading of smart contracts, peer-to-peer and energy sharing, self-consumption);
- Develop open-source tools for forecasting, prediction and advanced data analysis using AI tools and in-depth data analysis for customers and prosumers for autonomous optimisation of consumption, production, storage, smart devices (appliances), and electric vehicle (EV) both at household and energy community levels;
- Extend DSO SCADA and substation systems for autonomous control of grid assets and seamlessly integrate these systems with home and building energy management systems for direct and fast control and data acquisition to implement local (distribution) grid services (constrain alleviation, grid reconfiguration, restoration of supply, maintenance, and enhancement of energy quality), real-time assessment and monetisation of the use of grid resources;
- Integrate the three elements above as a basis to establish a platform for cooperation between individual customers or prosumers, entire energy communities, wide area aggregators, and DSOs to provide, acquire, and settle energy system-oriented services (system-wide balancing, support of frequency regulation). The cooperation platform should be based on a plug-and-play integration of the energy community eco-system components (hardware and software), using and extending relevant communication standards and data models. The integration mechanism should be embedded within the core systems used by customers/prosumers, DSO (and TSO), aggregators and market operators, fully aligned with SGAM;
- Develop tailored security solutions for private and public communication networks used by IoT apps and devices (smart appliances) across energy carriers;
- Ensure the follow-up and implementation of EU policy measures, including by conducting quality assessments and introducing national community energy targets;
- Foster institutional allies at local and regional levels;
- Provide access to and capacities for using digital planning tools;
- Identify the barriers for network operators (e.g. legal, economic, regulatory etc.) who want to introduce smart consumption options for their customers.
Preferably semantically interoperable interactions, as enabled by the ETSI SAREF ontologies, are used. Furthermore, the project should follow the IEC TR 63097 Smart Grid Roadmap, and where relevant, the developed solutions should be open for off-shelf integration using common communication and data standards.
The project should benefit from the direct participation of energy communities, smart appliances manufacturers, home energy devices manufacturers, home and building energy management system developers, Distribution System Operators (DSOs), and aggregators.
However, in order to comply with Article 33, 36 and 54 of Directive (EU) 2019/944, TSOs or DSOs participating in this project should not own, develop, manage or operate energy storage facilities or recharging points for electric vehicles. Moreover, the role of the distribution system operator in facilitating peer to peer trading should be without prejudice to the rules in Article 35 Directive (EU) 2019/944.
The developed solutions have to be tested within, at least, three energy communities from different European countries, preferably in regions with different socio-economic development contexts and different resource availabilities. Technical and social characteristics should be used in the project to validate the developed solutions' credibility. The demonstration sites should cover complex and technologically advanced energy communities, each located within the range of neighbouring secondary substations supplying a variety of customers/prosumers with close-to-autarky local energy generation, a range of energy vectors, a significant share of storage facilities, and flexible topology already available or to be achieved as an integral part of the project. The secondary substation should be already equipped with advanced monitoring and control systems.
In order to increase the replication potential of the deployed solutions the three energy communities are invited to closely collaborate with similar energy communities.
The selected projects are expected to contribute to the BRIDGE initiative and actively participate in its activities. Additional contributions to the ‘Alliance for Internet of Things Innovation’ (AIOTI) and other relevant activities (e.g., clusters of digital projects and coordinating actions) might be considered when relevant.
In particular, this topic requires the effective contribution of SSH disciplines and the involvement of SSH experts, institutions as well as the inclusion of relevant SSH expertise, in order to produce meaningful and significant effects enhancing the societal impact of the related research activities.
null
Activities are expected to achieve TRL 7-8 by the end of the project – see General Annex B. Activities may start at any TRL.
News flashes
EVALUATION results
Published: 16 September 2025
Deadline: 17 February 2026
Available budget: EUR 318.000.000
D3-01
D3-02
D3-05
D3-07
D3-08
D3-10
D3-12
D3-13
D3-14
D3-18
D3-19
D3-20
D3-22
D3-24
D4-01
D4-02
D4-03
D4-04
D4-05
D4-06
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)
35
28
26
74
43
20
19
2
33
12
56
43
20
118
72
75
59
50
56
35
Number of inadmissible proposals
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
1
2
0
Number of ineligible proposals
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
30
1
0
2
2
0
0
1
1
7
Number of above-threshold proposals
20
20
11
61
20
8
13
1
17
9
10
21
15
48
34
41
39
20
13
14
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals
(EUR/millions)
212.82
79.03
79.20
300.18
100.54
64.03
52.10
10.00
33.07
80.71
79.75
202.79
129.23
281,80
169.26
163.30
194.10
98.32
51.96
102.22
Number of proposals retained for funding
3
2
2
3
3
3
2
1
3
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
Number of proposals in the reserve list
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
14.50
15.00
13.00
15.00
13.50
14.50
15.00
12.50
14.50
14.00
15.00
15.00
13.00
14.50
14.00
15.00
14.50
14.00
14.00
14.50
Ranking distribution
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14
9
11
1
10
2
4
7
0
5
2
4
7
0
15
8
11
10
3
3
5
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13
6
3
2
19
5
3
3
0
5
5
3
7
3
17
3
9
7
3
2
7
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10
5
6
8
32
13
1
3
1
7
2
3
7
12
16
23
21
22
14
8
2
[1] Proposals with the same score were ranked according to the priority order procedure set out in the call conditions (for HE, in the General Annexes to the Work Programme or specific arrangements in the specific call/topic conditions).
To determine the ranking for ‘Innovation actions’, the score for ‘Impact’ is given a weight of 1.5.
[2] According to the specific condition of HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-01, to ensure a balanced portfolio coverage, grants are awarded to proposals not only in order of ranking but at least also to one proposal that is the highest ranked within the area of liquid advanced biofuels and at least also to one proposal that is the highest ranked within the area of liquid renewable fuels of non-biological origin, provided that proposals attain all thresholds (and subject to available budget).
According to the specific condition of HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-05, to ensure a balanced portfolio coverage, grants are awarded to proposals not only in order of ranking but at least also to one proposal that is the highest ranked within the area of concentrated solar power (CSP) and at least also to one proposal that is the highest ranked within the area of solar thermal heat and/or cold, provided that proposals attain all thresholds (and subject to available budget). Therefore, additional proposals are retained for funding to fulfil this condition.
According to the specific condition of HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-08, to ensure a balanced portfolio coverage, grants are awarded to applications not only in order of ranking, but priority will be given to high-ranking proposals that ensure, collectively, the best coverage of the different European sea basins (Atlantic Ocean, Baltic Sea, Black Sea, North Sea and Mediterranean Sea), provided that the proposals attain all thresholds. Therefore, additional proposals are retained for funding to fulfil this condition.
According to the specific condition of HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-14, to ensure a balanced portfolio coverage, grants are awarded to applications not only in order of ranking but at least also to one project that is the highest ranked within area 1., 2. or 3., provided that the applications attain all thresholds. Therefore, additional proposals are retained for funding to fulfil this condition.
According to the specific condition of HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-24, to ensure a balanced portfolio coverage of both (i) point-source capture and (ii) direct air capture technologies, grants are awarded to not only in order of ranking but at least also to one proposal that is the highest ranked within each area, provided they attain all thresholds (and subject to available budget).
Summary of observer report:
The process was professionally organized and executed with rigor. It was fair, impartial, expertise-driven, and transparently documented at every step. Consensus Reports, the definitive outputs of the evaluation, consistently met high quality standards, closely aligned with the published and communicated guidance, and complied with all applicable rules. Panels were composed to ensure balanced expertise, and newly introduced Vice-Chairs facilitated discussions that were structured, respectful, and evidence-based. Divergent assessments were addressed through focused, criterion-by-criterion debate, and rationales were clearly recorded to ensure traceability.
Robust safeguards supported integrity and consistency. Conflict-of-interest declarations were systematically collected and enforced. Calibration briefings promoted a common understanding of scoring scales and evaluation criteria, enabling consistent judgments across proposals and panels. Quality control mechanisms, including cross-checks, effectively harmonized outcomes without compromising the independence of assessments. Confidentiality was maintained throughout. Access controls in the SEP system and teleconferencing platforms were appropriate, data handling was secure, and sensitive information was treated with due care.
Operationally, the evaluation benefited from clear timelines, timely support to evaluators, and a reliable digital infrastructure. The documentation was complete and accessible, and the SEP system provided full transparency over inputs and decisions. Overall, the exercise adhered to its core principle, namely impartiality, fairness, and confidentiality throughout. The resulting evaluation summary reports and ranking list are consistent, well-reasoned, and aligned with the guiding documents.
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
PROPOSAL NUMBERS
Call HORIZON-CL5-2026-02 has closed on the 17/02/2026 (17:00).
876 proposals have been submitted.
The breakdown per topic is:
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-01: 35
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-02: 28
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-05: 26
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-07: 74
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-08: 43
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-10: 20
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-12: 19
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-13: 2
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-14: 33
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-18: 12
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-19: 56
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-20: 43
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-22: 20
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-24: 118
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D4-01: 71
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D4-02: 75
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D4-03: 60
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D4-04: 50
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D4-05: 56
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D4-06: 35
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in May 2026.
As call HORIZON-CL5-2026-02 is from the Horizon Europe Work Programme 2025, the following General Annexes apply:
Applicants must use the dedicated versions of the application form template for their proposal that are found in the Electronic Submission Service (see section ‘Start Submission’).
Opening date: 2025-09-16 (1 year ago)
Closing date: 2026-02-17 (7 months ago)
Procedure: single-stage
Budget: 20,000,000
Expected grants: 2
Contribution: 10,000,000 - 10,000,000
This call topic has been appended 3 times by the EC with news.
-
2026-10-09
evaluation resultspublished: 16 septembe... -
2026-10-09
proposal numbers  call horizon... -
2026-10-09
as call horizon-cl5-2026-02 is from the...
HORIZON-CL5-2026-02
Call topics are often grouped together in a call. Sometimes this is for a thematic reason, but often it is also for practical reasons.
There are 19 other topics in this call:
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-01
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-02
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-05
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-07
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-08
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-10
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-12
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-13
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-14
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-18
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-19
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-22
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D3-24
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D4-01
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D4-02
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D4-03
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D4-04
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D4-05
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-02-D4-06
Showing the latest information. Found 10 versions of this call topic in the F&T portal.
Information from
- 2026-06-26_06-40-25
- 2026-02-24_06-34-28
- 2026-02-18_06-34-10
- 2026-01-20_06-32-22
- 2026-01-16_06-32-24
- 2026-01-15_06-32-16
- 2025-10-28_15-45-44
- 2025-07-02_03-30-29
- 2025-06-07_03-30-09
- 2025-05-17_03-30-15
Check the differences between the versions.
Annotations
Events
Hand-picked events relevant to this call topic.
No events yet
There are currently no events linked to this call topic.
Timeline
Outcome expected · 17 Jul 2026 (2 months ago)
Next: Grant agreement signed, 1 week from now (17 Oct 2026, estimated)
Call published
17 May 2025
Work programme published
16 Jul 2025 · est.
Call opens
16 Sep 2025
Call closes
17 Feb 2026
Outcome expected
17 Jul 2026 · est.
Grant agreement signed
17 Oct 2026 · est.
-
Call published
17 May 2025 · 1 year ago
This topic was first published in TopicTree.
-
Work programme published Estimated
16 Jul 2025 · 1 year ago
Topics are listed in the Work Programme before the call opens. Spotting this early gives you a head start on partner search and proposal planning.
-
Call opens
16 Sep 2025 · 1 year ago
Submissions can be made from this date.
-
Call closes
17 Feb 2026 · 7 months ago
Deadline to submit a proposal.
-
Outcome expected Estimated
17 Jul 2026 · 2 months ago
The maximum time to inform applicants of the evaluation outcome is five months after the call closes.
-
Grant agreement signed Estimated
17 Oct 2026 · 1 week from now
The maximum time to sign the grant agreement is three months after applicants are informed of the outcome.
Funded Projects
Loading...
Project information comes from CORDIS (for Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe) and will be sourced from F&T Portal (for Digital Europe projects)
Ecosystem bubbles
This call topic is part of the following thematic bubbles.
Not part of a bubble yet
This call topic has not been grouped into an ecosystem bubble.