HORIZON-CL4-2026-02-DIGITAL-EMERGING-53-two-stage

Innovative AI methods and technologies for the process industries (RIA) (Processes4Planet and AI, Data and Robotics partnerships) -

⚫ indicates current topic
Node background color indicates the call topic status
Double click on a topic to center information around it.
Node size is proportional to distance from the current topic

About the connections

The graph above was generated based on the following links

  • HORIZON-CL4-INDUSTRY-2025-01-TWIN-TRANSITION-39
    Towards human-centric, sustainable and resilient energy-intensive industries (Processes4Planet and Clean Steel partnerships) (CSA)

    MOTIVATION Projects under HORIZON-CL4-2026-02-DIGITAL-EMERGING-53-two-stage may should link to the initiative formed under HORIZON-CL4-2025-01-TWIN-TRANSITION-39.

Call text (as on F&T portal)

View on F&T portal

Expected Outcome:

Projects are expected to contribute to the following outcomes:

  • To develop and demonstrate innovative AI-driven solutions in materials and process development to enhance the competitiveness and sustainability of the process industries by better products and process technologies and reducing the time to market
  • To increase the competitiveness of materials production in Europe by AI-supported optimal operation of plants and value networks and early detection of problems and failures
  • To improve the working conditions in the plants by using AI technologies, metaverse, and robots.

Scope:

Drastically improved AI methods and technologies hold transformative potential for the process industries, enabling advancements in process design, operational efficiency, and faster innovation across the entire lifecycle of plants and products. By using different AI approaches such as multimodal generative AI, foundation models, and agentic AI, the industry can move beyond conventional AI applications as e.g. predictive maintenance and quality control toward more intelligent, adaptive, and creative solutions.

AI-based solutions can deliver value at every stage of the process lifecycle. In design and engineering, they can enable new innovations and accelerate the development process. During operations, AI technologies can be employed to optimize processes, enhance reproducibility, adapt to changing conditions, and provide new forms of support for the workforce and enable autonomous operation. In value chains, AI can help to adapt faster and detect changing customer needs. These capabilities support faster innovation and strengthen competitiveness in a rapidly evolving industrial landscape. However, realizing this potential requires careful consideration of risks related to reliability, security, and trust, ensuring that AI solutions are effective, safe, and responsible.

Proposals should produce dedicated innovative AI-based solutions for the process industry for one of the following scopes:

  • More effective and faster development of new materials and processes
  • Competitive and sustainable production, reducing the negative environmental impact of industry
  • Reduction of risks for the health of the workforce and for the environment and making workplaces in the process industries more attractive.

In the projects, user acceptance and training of the users as well as integration into the OT/IT landscape of the companies should be taken into account, e.g. through active engagement in design, development and integration of systems and processes.

This topic is linked to the Apply AI Strategy, therefore proposals should seek collaboration with relevant initiatives.

Proposals should include a business case and exploitation strategy, as outlined in the introduction to Destination ‘Leadership in materials and production for Europe’.

This topic implements the co-programmed European Partnerships Processes4Planet and AI, Data and Robotics.

null

Activities are expected to start at TRL 4-5 and achieve TRL 6 by the end of the project – see General Annex B.

News flashes

2026-08-23

CALL UPDATE: GENERALISED FEEDBACK FOR SUCCESSFUL APPLICANTS AFTER STAGE 1

HORIZON-CL4-2026-02-two-stage (stage 1)

To best ensure equal treatment, successful Stage 1 applicants do not receive evaluation summary reports (ESRs) pertaining to their proposals. Instead, the Agency provides generalised feedback with information and advice that might assist applicants in preparing Stage 2 full proposals.

This generalised feedback is based on the most common shortcomings identified in the ESRs of successful Stage 1 applicants. It is not intended as individual feedback for a specific ESR. In preparing a Stage 2 full proposal, applicants may choose to address or clarify these shortcomings.

Please be mindful that a stage 2 full proposal will undergo more detailed evaluation, possibly by a new group of independent external experts. It is essential to ensure that the full proposal is consistent with the brief outline proposal submitted at Stage 1. It must NOT differ substantially.

HORIZON-CL4-2026-02-DIGITAL-EMERGING-53-two-stage

EXCELLENCE

IMPACT

  • In some cases, the KPIs provided to substantiate the concrete contributions and impacts of the proposed projects are not sufficiently explained.
  • The contribution to new material or product development is in some cases limited, with a stronger focus on optimising existing processes rather than enabling breakthrough innovations.
  • Claims regarding reduced time-to-market are not sufficiently detailed, with unclear pathways for achieving such improvements.
  • The development of AI-driven solutions for competitiveness and sustainability is not always credible, particularly where proposals focused narrowly on operational efficiency rather than broader industrial transformation.
  • 2026-08-23

    CALL UPDATE: FLASH EVALUATION RESULTS

    Published: 16.12.2025

    Deadline: 17.03.2026

    Available budget: EUR 98,000,000.00

    In accordance with General Annex D of the Work Programme, the evaluation of the first-stage proposals was made looking only at the criteria ‘Excellence’ and ‘Impact’. The threshold for both criteria was 4. The overall threshold (applying to the sum of the two individual scores) was set for each topic/type of action with separate call-budget-split at a level that allowed the total requested budget of proposals admitted to stage 2 be as close as possible to 3 times the available budget (and not below 2 times). The thresholds that were applied are the following:

    HORIZON-CL4-2026-02-DIGITAL-EMERGING-51-two-stage – “AI improved advanced manufacturing and production processes in factories (RIA) (Made in Europe and AI, Data and Robotics partnerships): 9.5 points

    HORIZON-CL4-2026-02-MAT-PROD-21-two-stage – “Development of safe and sustainable alternatives to substances of concern (IA)”: 8.5 points

    HORIZON-CL4-2026-02-DIGITAL-EMERGING-53-two-stage - Innovative AI methods and technologies for the process industries (RIA) (Processes4Planet and AI, Data and Robotics partnerships): 9.5 points

    The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:

    HORIZON-CL4-2026-02-DIGITAL-EMERGING-51-two-stage

    HORIZON-CL4-2026-02-DIGITAL-EMERGING-53-two-stage

    HORIZON-CL4-2026-02-MAT-PROD-21-two-stage

    Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)

    191

    79

    52

    Number of inadmissible proposals

    4

    0

    0

    Number of ineligible proposals

    3

    1

    0

    Number of above-threshold proposals

    33

    21

    17

    Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals

    189827153.75

    121314614.38

    114126082.2

    Number of proposals in the reserve list

    N/A

    N/A

    N/A

    Ranking distribution

    Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 10 and higher or equal to 9

    55

    31

    12

    Number of proposals with scores lower than 9 and higher or equal to 8

    54

    18

    16

    Summary of observer report:

    The evaluation of HORIZON-CL4-2026-02-two-stage, stage 1, was carried out through a structured remote process, including expert briefings, individual evaluations, written SEP discussions, consensus preparation and remote consensus meetings. The observer reviewed a structured sample of meetings and proceedings in SEP, including proposal records, written discussion trails and consensus documentation. The overall assessment is clearly positive. The process demonstrated professionalism, transparency and procedural maturity. The observed meetings were generally well prepared and effectively facilitated, with evaluators applying the award criteria through structured discussion and with due attention to consistency, impartiality and confidentiality. Commission/Agency staff supported the process constructively and neutrally, helping discussions remain focused on the criteria and requirements, while respecting independent expert judgement. SEP provided a robust process record and supported traceability across the evaluation workflow, including written exchanges, scoring status and consensus outputs. The process appeared proportionate to the scale and complexity of the call. The observed evaluation was compliant with the applicable rules and aligned with the principles of excellence, transparency, fairness, impartiality, confidentiality, speed and efficiency. No indication was observed that would call into question the fairness of the process or the equal treatment of proposals. Practical improvement points were identified concerning operational resilience in remote evaluation work: technical readiness for remote conferencing, reliable backup channels if the main evaluation system is temporarily unavailable, role-specific expert preparedness, and systematic meeting opening procedures. Overall, the evaluation process was of high quality and provides confidence that the procedure was conducted fairly, professionally and in line with the applicable evaluation framework.

    We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.

    For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.

    2026-08-23

    CALL UPDATE: PROPOSAL NUMBERS

    PROPOSAL NUMBERS

    Call HORIZON-CL4-2026-02-two-stage_stage 1 has closed on 17.03.2026.

    322 proposals have been submitted.

    The breakdown per topic is:

    • HORIZON-CL4-2026-02-DIGITAL-EMERGING-51-two-stage: 191
    • HORIZON-CL4-2026-02-DIGITAL-EMERGING-53-two-stage: 79
    • HORIZON-CL4-2026-02-MAT-PROD-21-two-stage: 52

    Evaluation results are expected to be communicated around the 4th week of June 2026.

    2026-08-23

    The technical issue affecting the upload of part B to the proposal submission tool has now been resolved.

    2026-08-23

    Dear Applicants,

    Please note that, due to a technical issue, it is currently not possible to upload part B to the proposal submission tool. Our IT service is actively working to resolve the issue shortly.

    We apologise for any temporary inconvenience caused.

    2026-08-23
    The submission session is now available for: HORIZON-CL4-2026-02-DIGITAL-EMERGING-53-two-stage, HORIZON-CL4-2026-02-MAT-PROD-21-two-stage, HORIZON-CL4-2026-02-DIGITAL-EMERGING-51-two-stage
    Found 6 annotations in info base click to see
    call topic details
    Call status: Closed
    Opening date: 2025-12-16 (8 months ago)
    Closing date: 2026-03-17 (5 months ago)
    Procedure: two-stage

    Budget: 30,000,000
    Expected grants: 6
    Contribution: 4,000,000 - 6,000,000
    News flashes

    This call topic has been appended 6 times by the EC with news.

    • 2026-08-23
      call update: generalised feedback for su...
    • 2026-08-23
      call update: flash evaluation resultspub...
    • 2026-08-23
      call update: proposal numbersproposal nu...
    • 2026-08-23
      the technical issue affecting the upload...
    • 2026-08-23
      dear applicants, please note that, due t...
    • 2026-08-23
      the submission session is now available...
    Call

    HORIZON-CL4-2026-02-two-stage

    Call topics are often grouped together in a call. Sometimes this is for a thematic reason, but often it is also for practical reasons.

    There are 2 other topics in this call:

    Source information

    Showing the latest information. Found 10 versions of this call topic in the F&T portal.

    Information from

    • 2026-07-15_06-38-51
    • 2026-03-20_06-34-40
    • 2026-03-18_06-33-58
    • 2026-03-03_06-33-52
    • 2026-02-04_06-32-24
    • 2025-12-24_06-31-05
    • 2025-12-20_06-31-02
    • 2025-12-19_06-31-14
    • 2025-12-16_06-31-02
    • 2025-12-13_06-30-36

    Check the differences between the versions.

    Annotations

    You must be logged in to add annotations
    EC infoday info
    Added 6 months ago by Alrun Hauke
    According to information provided at the Cluster 4 Info Days 2026, for OT and IT integration, it is acceptable to use a generic integration approach or to cover only the OT parts used in pilots. The topic does not force one approach. The proposal should justify the added value of whichever integration level it chooses and explain why it makes sense for the targeted process-industry cases.
    EC infoday info
    Added 6 months ago by Alrun Hauke
    According to information provided at the Cluster 4 Info Days 2026, contributions to standardisation can support faster uptake, especially when developing new materials and processes. Also, policy recommendations are generally welcome in R&I projects and can be included if they are relevant. Neither is strictly an expected outcome of this topic, however.
    EC infoday info
    Added 6 months ago by Alrun Hauke
    According to information provided at the Cluster 4 Info Days 2026, cyber-security is not a standalone mandatory research line in this topic. But applicants should explain how their solution reduces operational risks and what the novelty is for the process-industry context, rather than assuming baseline integration security is sufficient without justification.
    EC infoday info
    Added 6 months ago by Alrun Hauke
    According to information provided at the Cluster 4 Info Days 2026, partners from an unsuccessful stage 1 consortium can join another consortium that passed stage 1, provided the consortium stays consistent with the objectives that were evaluated at stage 1. Because stage 2 requires a more detailed implementation plan and a more accurate budget calculation, the budget may also be adjusted somewhat.
    Call Document info
    Added 6 months ago by Alrun Hauke
    This is a two-stage call topic. The first stage will be avaluated blindly, meaning your part B for the first stage may not contain any information on the identity of your consortium members. Watch the recording of the EC info session on how this works: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sz2MWKDbFdE
    Call Document info: POLICY/INITIATIVE BACKGROUND
    Added 8 months ago by Monica Pretti

    Events

    This is just a very first implementation, better visualisation coming

    Horizon Europe Industry 2026 Brokerage Event

    2026-01-12 -> 2026-04-17

    online

    This is the place to find partners for EU projects in industrial technologies and advanced manufacturing under Horizon Europe 2026 Cluster 4 Industry calls with deadlines 17 Mar 2026 (first stage of two-stage calls) and 21 Apr 2026 (single-stage calls).

    Horizon Europe Cluster 4 Info Days 2026

    2026-01-29 -> 2026-01-30

    online

    During the Info Days, representatives of the European Commission will present the 2026 call topics in Horizon Europe Cluster 4 and answer questions from the audience. You do not need to register to attend this online event, simply follow the live stream on the day.

    KETs Brokerage Event 2026

    2026-02-04 -> 2026-02-05

    online

    Do you want to tackle the challenges of Industry, Manufacturing & Production, Materials, Digital/AI/Robotics, Batteries and Hydrogen? - Then use the unique opportunities of the KETs (Key Enabling Technologies) 2026 EU Brokerage Event on February 5, 2026 in Karlsruhe, Germany!

    Events are added by the ideal-ist NCP community and are hand-picked. If you would like to suggest an event, please contact idealist@ffg.at.

    Call topic timeline

    What phase of the topic timeline are we in? This timeline contains some suggestions on what are realistic actions you should or could take at this moment. The timeline is based on the information provided by the call topic.
    1. Work programme available

      - 10 months ago

      The call topics are published first in the Work Programme, which is available a while before the call opens. By following up the Work Programme publications, you can get a headstart.

    2. Publication date

      - 8 months ago

      The call was first imported in TopicTree.

    3. Opening date

      - 8 months ago

      The call opened for submissions.

    4. Closing date

      - 5 months ago

      Deadline for submitting a project.

    5. Time to inform applicants Estimate

      - 1 week ago

      The maximum time to inform applicants (TTI) of the outcome of the evaluation is five months from the call closure date.

    6. Today

    7. Sign grant agreement Estimate

      - 2 months from now

      The maximum time to sign grant agreements (TTG) is three months from the date of informing applicants.

    Funded Projects

    Loading...

    Project information comes from CORDIS (for Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe) and will be sourced from F&T Portal (for Digital Europe projects)

    Call document info

    This section will come soon and contain the scraped information from the call document, such as the expected impact, scope, and other relevant sections. In the meantime, you can find this information in the call text section or directly on the F&T portal. View on F&T portal